Europe Weighs Its Response to Putin’s Shadow War
Europe is debating how to respond to the campaign of intimidation and ambiguous hostile activity described as Putin’s shadow war. Moscow’s approach relies on uncertainty as much as fear: when responsibility is difficult to establish or an incident falls short of open conflict, governments can struggle to agree on whether, when and how to retaliate.
That ambiguity serves a broader strategic purpose. Russia seeks to exploit differences among European governments, weaken unity within NATO and make continued support for Ukraine appear more dangerous. The pressure is therefore aimed not only at immediate targets but also at the political cohesion on which Europe’s security policy depends.
The central dilemma is how to impose meaningful costs without triggering an uncontrolled escalation. A response that is too restrained could encourage further Russian action and signal that covert pressure works; one that is too forceful could intensify confrontation with Moscow. European leaders must also decide whether retaliation should be publicly attributable and collective, or retain some of the deniability that characterizes the campaign itself. The debate ultimately concerns deterrence: Europe needs to demonstrate that hostile acts will have consequences while preserving NATO unity and avoiding a slide toward direct conflict.
Continue in the app — vote & join in ➔